A comparative query asks how two or more things differ, which is better, or how to choose between options. It decomposes heavily — the model generates sub-queries for each dimension of comparison, each option being compared, and the evaluative criteria involved.
Comparative queries are where wide fan-out creates the most citation opportunity. Each dimension of comparison is a separate sub-query with its own retrieval round. Content structured around specific comparison dimensions — answering one dimension per section — retrieves far more effectively than content that attempts to address the comparison as a whole. Brands that own the answer to one specific dimension of a comparison consistently earn citation even when they are not the top-ranked result for the parent query.